You mean “should the repository be removed?” as there already is no tag, and therefor no image. You wasted time, either because you didn’t check and/or understood that there is actually no image to pull in this repository.
It indeed looks odd that google has a verified test repo with no image in it.
Thank you! You’re right; I didn’t have a complete understanding of tagging and availability. I think if a repository has no image, it should be removed. This way, users wouldn’t need to see the link in searches.
To be more precise, Google as a publisher is verified, not the repository
Since the repository is 6 years old, I guess they created it as the first repo to test if it works and left there in case they need it in the future. I also have some test repos and some of them are public so I could push an image of someone else to test if pulling the image works from my repo. True, I am not a verified publisher