Hi, I’ve checked it today. 146 are issuing, 1 okay. Only Node JS is available.
Docker AI is additionally ignorant, I tried to file the issues, but Docker AI didn’t let me submit the file and error id. It’s crazy AI.
I don’t understand how Docker AI has to do anything with submitting an issue. Normally you would send an issue here on GitHub:
But if the issue is that the libraries of the Linux distribution have vulnerabilities, you will see that fixed only after it is fixed in the distribution. Then the cloud image (not made by Docker) has ot be updated as well. I haven’t checked if it happened, but the image descriptions show where the rootfs is from
https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu
How is the rootfs built?
The tarballs published by Canonical, referenced by dist-* tags in https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+oci/ubuntu-base Git repository, are built from scripts that live in the livecd-rootfs project, especially live-build/auto/build. The builds are run on Launchpad. For build history see livefs build pages of individual releases on Launchpad:Focal
Jammy
Noble
Oracular
If these were updated already and only the Docker images were not rebuilt, I think you can open an issue on GitHub
Dear Ákos Takács, I would agree with you, but I cant. I’m not stupid and I’m not lying. I would upload three PDF file with copied screenshots of the issues. But I’m not allowed to do that. That’s the Docker Forum Policy, it’s not me, it’s your fault.
I tried to make screenshots of the screenshot and copy it inside this message, but “An error occurred: Sorry, new users can only put one embedded media item in a post.”
So:
I’ve more if you don’t believe me! See a link integrated is navigating to issue formula, but the formula is checked by AI, maybe Docker AI, and can’t be submit, in the end. That’s really stupid and an ignorant behavier against users.
And believe each of the 147 Official Images were issued, except Node JS.
This is a community forum, Docker users support each other here 
If you found a bug, you should submit it via Github to the developers.
So you don’t agree with that I didn’t understand the issue.
I started my post with “I don’t understand”. “issued” doesn’t really say much about the problem and I still tried to guess it and give you some answers. To get good help, you need to describe the problem. It doesn’t necessarily require screenshots. If you just say you visit the page of an official image on Docker Hub and you get a “Something went wrong” message, that is more than enough information for us to check the page, see if it works or not, and if we cannot reproduce it, we can ask for more details, or at least share the right GitHub project where you can report the issue. In this case, this would have been the right one:
I still don’t understand the AI part, which doesn’t mean I think anyone is lying or not smart enough, just that I don’t understand. As @bluepuma77 wrote, this is a community forum and people are happy to help you if you communicate with respect as everyone is doing it in their free time.
There were multiple issues with Docker Hub in the last couple of days. Based on the Docker status notifications it was mainly on Thursday and Friday. So it is possible you were also the “victim” of one of those. I hope it is all working now.
@rimelek thank you for your time to look and reflect on my post.
I will try to explain the part why I think there is a AI issue more precisely.
We agreed the error pages opened for 146 of the 147 docker image projects when I was testing the whole bunch. Right!
Each error page contains the link to the reporting page and an individual id-String. Already this couldn’t be senseful, because the general problem was a disfunction or misconfiguration on web services side, I expected that.
So, why wasn’t the reporting web page hanging already for the first image I checked? The formula fields opened not at all but in first click on submit button same formula opened another field to be filled with text; this happens three times, until I think back office AI was willing to accept the data I wrote and tried several times to submit clicking on the submit button.
Next, I tried several times to submit another individual id-String for another image web page I checked and got only the error page with the individual id-String. I’ve learned to inspect systems behaviour, not only for one time, because only one is nothing. This is a base instruction for SixSigma: Gage R&R. Take a weight, measuring your systems behaviour again and again, reproducibility and repeatability.
What was the back office system doing? It opened the report page completely from first. When I filled the fields of formula and clicked on the submit button, nothing happened. I’ve tried it for different images again, same behaviour. What’s that may I ask you? How will you explain it to me understandable?
This is my understanding, when AI is misused and lead users into a very uncomfortable situation and feelings of twices. This is manipulation. And with respect, in the EU it’s a criminal act, that should be reported to the officials of the EU until this administrative organisation exist.
That’s what I think!